pattern · forms
Smart defaults
also called good defaults (ui-patterns), sensible defaults (community), prefilled values (community), recommended option (goodui)
Prefilling a choice with the answer most people in this situation want, so the common case needs no work and every other case is still reachable.
A default is the answer the interface gives on the reader’s behalf before they have said anything. It is not a neutral act. Defaults are the most powerful control on any form, because most people accept them: Eric Johnson and Daniel Goldstein’s 2003 study of organ donor registration found participation rates differing by tens of percentage points between countries whose only meaningful difference was whether the box started ticked. Whatever a form starts with is what most of its answers will be. A smart default is the deliberate use of that fact in the reader’s favour, filling in what the situation already implies so that the common case is a single tap and every other case is one gesture away.
Good defaults come from three places. The reader’s own context supplies most of them: locale, timezone, the address on file, the card used last time, today’s date in a date field. Population data supplies the rest: if four in five people pick standard delivery, standard delivery is the honest starting point. And where neither knows, the default should be the least destructive option, since an accepted default that does nothing is recoverable and one that spends money is not. Saying why on screen turns a guess into information: a small “Most common” beside the preselected shipping method tells the minority who need something else that the form is not merely assuming, and it costs the majority nothing.
The line between this and the dark twin is direction, not mechanism. A smart default serves the reader’s likely intent; a preselection serves the seller, and it is catalogued as a dark pattern for good reason. Three rules keep the two apart. Never default to spending more, sharing more, or consenting to more: consent under the GDPR has to be an affirmative act, which is why a pre-ticked marketing box is a compliance problem and not a design preference. Never hide the default: a prefilled field a reader can see is one they can correct, while an assumption made silently is discovered at the worst moment. And changing it has to be a single, visible gesture, never a trip into a settings screen.
Two failure modes remain even when the intent is good. A default that is right for the majority is wrong for someone, so the exception path deserves the same care as the happy one: an inferred country that cannot be changed until a page reloads is worse than an empty select. And some fields have no defensible default at all. A name, a password, a medical answer, a legal declaration: prefilling those does not save work, it invites a person to agree to something they did not read.
Which word?
| If you want | say |
|---|---|
| the form arrives already answered the way you would have | smart defaults |
| a wizard asks for the address a second time | redundant entry |
| the marketing box is already ticked when you get there | preselected opt-in |
Related
See also: Forgiving format