---
name: Common region
slug: common-region
category: layout
status: published
created: 2026-08-21T00:00:00.000Z
modified: 2026-08-21T00:00:00.000Z
definition: The grouping principle that anything inside a shared boundary reads
  as one group, strong enough to beat how far apart the items actually are.
aliases:
  - name: law of common region
    source: community
  - name: Gestalt common region
    source: nngroup
  - name: container grouping
    source: community
tags:
  - perception
relations:
  contrastWith:
    - proximity
    - box
  variantOf: []
  partOf: []
  seeAlso: []
implementations: []
sources:
  - title: "The Principle of Common Region: Containers Create Groupings, NN/g"
    url: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/common-region/
demo: inline
exhibit: false
useWhen: when a container has to beat the spacing
---

Draw a line around some things and they become one thing. That is the whole principle, and
it was the last of the Gestalt grouping laws to be described, by Stephen Palmer in 1992,
because it is so obvious that it took a while to notice it was doing work. A border, a
shared background, a card, or a panel all state the same claim: whatever is inside this
edge belongs together, and whatever is outside it does not.

What makes common region worth naming separately is that it wins. Put six items in a row at
equal spacing, draw a box around the first three, and no amount of gap between items two
and three will pull them apart again. Enclosure outranks nearness, which is why it is the
tool for grouping things you are not allowed to move: a settings page whose sections are
fixed in order, a form whose fields cannot be resequenced, a dashboard where the tiles are
placed by the reader. [Proximity](/proximity) can only group by rearranging, so where the
arrangement is out of your hands, the boundary is the only lever left.

The cost is ink. Every boundary is a line the reader has to look past to get to the
content, and a page that draws one around each of nine things has spent its whole visual
budget on saying that nine things exist. This is what the flat era was reacting to when it
deleted the boxes, and the compromise that survived it is the softest boundary that still
reads: a background tint with no stroke at all, or a hairline where the tint would clash
with the content. Nielsen Norman Group's
[write-up of the principle](https://www.nngroup.com/articles/common-region/) makes the same
point from the other side, that a container is a strong signal and strong signals should be
spent rarely.

The rule that follows is to pick one grouping device and let it be the only one. Spacing,
enclosure, and a shared colour all say the same sentence, and saying it three times is how a
page ends up loud. Reach for the region when the grouping has to survive an arrangement you
do not control, when a group must be interactive as a unit (a [card](/card) is a common
region you can click), or when two groups must sit side by side with no room for a gap
between them. Otherwise let the [whitespace](/whitespace) do it, and keep the boundary in
reserve.
